Crete Athletic Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 470786928
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Crete, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4025600725
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $80,643
- Expenses
- $74,154
- Assets
- $75,139
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KARA YEAGER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- REBECCA UNDERWOOD (SECRETARY)
- DARCIE ROSS (TREASURER)
- CARRIE KOTIL (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The objects, purposes and powers of the corporation shall be to promote and increase interest in school athletics and endeavors; promote sportsmanship within and around the crete, Nebraska community and school district; assist and support participants, coaches and school officials at various athletic events; encourage the crete school system and crete area community to become active supporters of the athletic program; to facilitate greater understanding and involvement of crete junior-senior high sports; to assist, plan, administer, organize or institute athetic events or fund raising projects to support athletic events or programs; and to do and perform any and all other acts and duties permissible, required, feasible, useful or necessary under the laws of this state for the purposes set forth herein. Such corporation is being formed not for any pecuniary profit or financial gain to its members, officers, or directors.
What it reported doing in 2024
Expenditures paid on behalf of crete public schools athletic participants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.7%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 97.6%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 66.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.7% of revenue deployed · 97.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.