Crescent Moon Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822273982
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Lafayette, CA, US
- Phone
- (925) 310-4374
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $292,820
- Expenses
- $320,908
- Assets
- $72,489
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Karen Kahn (President)
People named in this filing
- Jennifer Georges Schneider (Secretary)
- Karen Kahn (President)
- LORI ESPINOSA (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Crescent Moon Center offers an empowering path to resilience, clarity and purpose through equine-assisted learning and expressive arts. We create a supportive environment where you can reflect and connect with community.
What it reported doing in 2025
Crescent Moon Center provided 38 workshops and served 340 participants. All participants received workshops at no-cost or by sliding-scale donation. Programs with community partners helped to extend our reach and ensure access for marginalized communities, low-income individuals, those with disabilities, and people recovering from addiction and mental health challenges.Participants were 89% female and ranged in age (18-60+) with the majority falling in the age range of 31-50, showing the programs broad appeal especially to women experiencing mental health challenges in mid-life. The data suggests there is a need for us to reach more men with our program. By expanding our Community Partner Program, we ensured accessibility for low-income, marginalized communities. 50% of participants were BIPOC individuals and 82% of participants were from Solano County, where trauma, addiction, and limited access to wellness resources disproportionately affect residents.Our data shows that many individuals struggling with substance use disorder are also suffering from numerous forms of trauma, disability, chronic health issues, poverty, and unemployment. 73% of our participants reported being in recovery for substance use and 73% report having a history of trauma. 42% struggled with a disability or chronic condition. 87% of participants were low-income, defined as$75K annually. 77% of participants were extremely low income, defined as$25K annually. This reflects the Centers commitment to creating an inclusive space for all participants and our dedication to tackling the mental health crisis in Solano County. Participants need our support to achieve sustained mental health and wellbeing in their recovery from trauma, while also maintaining sobriety. Our mission is to create a community of support around people in recovery from mental health challenges, including stress, trauma, addiction and disability.Based on post workshop surveys, Archway participants self-reported improvements in learning skills that support their long-term recovery and wellbeing. 83% Improved Emotional Awareness 83% Improved Coping Skills 90% Improved Healthy RelatingOur years work included the start of: A partnership with Archway Recovery Services, a multi-stepped residential addiction program in Fairfield, providing expressive arts, nature-based experiences, mindfulness and equine-assistedlearning workshops to women on a bi-weekly basis; A partnership with the Downtown Youth Wellness Center (DYWC), a Santa Clara County Behavioral Health program dedicated to promoting a safe, supportive, and youth-focused environment. As part of our pilot program with young adults (18-25), we offered 1 year of free monthly expressive arts workshops to support and empower these at-risk youth who experience homelessness, substance abuse, mental illness, autism, and domestic violence. Many events including: An Earth Day Celebration at Rush Ranch, where we invited the public to create a community art painting. Adults, youth and families joined in. A nature photography walk around Rush Ranch led by an award-winning eco-therapist and videographer where people, inspired by the surrounding environment, took photographs of plants, trees, wildlife, ranch work, horses and the cows which live in neighboring pastures as part of Mays Mental Health month in Solano County.We increased the number of volunteers who work with the Crescent Moon team and brought them to Rush Ranch for a day of ranch chores. As part of our growing volunteer program, we piloted volunteer days with Access Adventure and the Solano Land Trust to engage volunteers interested in land-based community activities. Volunteers learned ranch skills, land stewardship and, most importantly, engagement with community service. We invested in a highly skilled and experienced independent program evaluator with whom we met weekly to gather data from surveys of all of our workshops and analyze program outcomes. Participants fill out pre-and post-
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.3%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 69.6%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 76.3% of revenue deployed · 69.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $223K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.