Crescent Community Charities of the Capital Region Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473434993
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Glenmont, NY, USA
Phone
2123808021
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion

Reported finances

Revenue
$180
Expenses
$1,650
Assets
$7,271
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Roberto Peguero (CEO/President)

People named in this filing

  • Roberto Peguero (CEO/President)
  • Jermaine Harris (Treasurer)
  • Charlie Harvey (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose is to promote community service and related activities in the Capital District Region of New York State, inclusive of Albany, Schenectady, Rensselaer, and Saratoga counties, as well as all cities and towns within those counties. Equally, to assist these communities and residents through charitable giving towards the Hugh Danston Davis Memorial Scholarship Fund, providing educational scholarships for the Capital Region's residents; promotion of youth mentoring programs known as Sigma Beta Clubs, as well as service to the community which may provide educational supplies to youth; food and clothing distribution to individuals in need of such services.

What it reported doing in 2024

H. Danston Davis Memorial Scholarship Fund awarded funds/grant to the H. Danston Davis Urban Swim Program located at/within the Capital District YMCA to fund full compliment of swimming education for approximately 30 youth who do not have access to swimming education in order to learn how to survive in aquatic environments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -816.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.41; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.