Crescent City Cafe Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812356736
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New Orleans, LA, USA
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $120,373
- Expenses
- $101,330
- Assets
- $112,751
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lindsay Hendrix (President and Director)
- Adelle Bergman (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Georgia McBride Agerton (Director)
- Lindsay Hendrix (President and Director)
- Arthur Kraatz (Secretary and Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Charity-The Crescent City Cafe serves New Orleans unhoused and food-insecure residents with dignity and provides individuals the opportunity to build relationships and connect with one another through the sharing of a meal.
What it reported doing in 2024
Charity-The Crescent City Cafe serves with dignity New Orleans unhoused and food-insecure residents and provides individuals the opportunity to build relationships and connect with one another through the sharing of a meal. In 2024 we continued to serve our guests at the bi-weekly Saturday Cafes as well as made strategic progress toward our donation-based restaurant expansion. In 2024 we served 1439 guests at our Saturday Cafes hosted 526 volunteers and made strategic progress towards opening our donation-based restaurant.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 60.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $101K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.