Creative Solutions for Positive Youth Development
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932378059
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7022532806
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $876,281
- Expenses
- $938,802
- Assets
- $250,030
- Liabilities
- $312,926
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DR MEGAN FREEMAN (ED AND CHAIR): $142,340 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Facilitate the optimal development of young people and their families through inclusive and individualized services, supports, and training.
What it reported doing in 2024
Social-emotional learning (sel) is a framework designed to develop skills in the following areas: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision making. Groups are facilitated by mental health team members. Group participants will be determined by clubhouse staff and creative solutions for positive youth development team members, and groups will occur once a week for the duration of the trimester. Families will consent to their children attending group therapy and receive the group curriculum prior to the first group session. Sel group therapy topics will include: -mindfulness -self-esteem -conflict resolution -problem solving -assertive communication -distress tolerance -emotion regulation -resilience individual and family therapy -members, families, teachers, mentors, outside therapists, and clubhouse staff members will refer members to services as needed. -members and families will be assigned to an appropriate therapist, who will conduct intake assessments, create comprehensive and individualized treatment plans, facilitate weekly individual and family therapy sessions in the clubs, and consult with club staff and outside providers as needed. -services will be low to no cost for members and their families through billing insurance, both medicaid and commercial insurances, donations, and grant funding. Interventions we use a combination of evidence-based mental and behavioral health strategies in addition to supplemental methods to treat our members, including, but not limited to: -cognitive behavioral therapy (cbt) -dialectical behavioral therapy (dbt) -trauma focused cognitive behavioral therapy (tf-cbt) -motivational interviewing (mi) -acceptance and commitment therapy (act) -art therapy -music therapy -play therapy -animal-assisted therapy
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 57
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.1%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 73.8%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $22.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.25; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.2%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.1% of revenue deployed · 73.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $693K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $142K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.