Create Healthy Management
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 746083124
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Fredericksburg, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8309971297
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,688,791
- Expenses
- $10,456,882
- Assets
- $176,019,083
- Liabilities
- $4,827,188
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jayne Pope (President and CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Jayne Pope (President and CEO): $362,130 total reported compensation
- Amanda Stevens (VP of Strategic Philanthropy): $204,256 total reported compensation
- Chris Semmler (VP of Finance): $194,336 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Create Healthy is on a mission for health and wellness in our community; Investing in wellness, empowering communities . We are investing in and supporting local programs, organizations, and ventures that align with the priorities of our community and promote health and wellness in the Hill Country. Our vision for the future: A Hill Country where all contribute and thrive.
What it reported doing in 2024
Wellness Center - supports health and well-being through a variety of services and programs. These include access to fitness equipment and exercise classes, health seminars, CPR and first aid training, nutrition education and dietary consultations, health and fitness screenings, free blood pressure checks, and counseling sessions. The center also offers childcare services, youth day camps, and massage therapy. By the end of 2024, the center had 3,572 members and recorded 192,952 program visits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 62% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 83%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.3%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.83; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 83% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $362K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $335K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 49 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 49 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.