Crazy Love Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471182550
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
6504836682
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,945,493
Expenses
$1,842,298
Assets
$8,460,050
Liabilities
$30,270

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KUK KIM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • FRANCIS CHAN (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KUK KIM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $109,481 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT ZABALA (DIRECTOR/CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD): $57,481 total reported compensation
  • FRANCIS CHAN (PRESIDENT): $56,346 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Crazy Love's core mission is to promote a higher view of God.

What it reported doing in 2024

Special projects: god often surprises crazy love with different opportunities to serve him, but these opportunities do not always become one of our core programs like content, teaching, mercy ministries, or housing. As such, we have created a special vertical called "special projects" to incubate these different areas that we get to serve him in. Our hope is that each of these "special projects" can be spun off as standalone, sustainable and effective ministries after a few years of incubation. Listed below are some of these "special projects".food development program: at the end of 2019, crazy love was approached by jones chan, a food scientist who had a recipe for an innovative food product that would be 3 to 5 times more nutritious than what was currently being distributed in food relief programs around the world-and this food product was cheaper too! Crazy love began a partnership with jones and developed our superfood initiative to launch in afghanistan. We worked closely with a local partner in afghanistan who was already on the ground there and had the infrastructure to not only make this food product, but also to distribute it at scale. Even with the fall of the country to the taliban, god allowed us to continue to produce and distribute much needed food for orphanages and displacement camps for refugees there. Locally, we have developed a nutrient dense meal bar that is specifically designed for the poor and those experiencing homelessness. The packaging of the meal bar contains a qr code that show videos of the gospel message when it is scanned. We pray that the bar can be used as a platform to speak hope and to share the love of christ. The food development program started spinning off from crazy love in 2023 and became their own 501(c)(3) non-profit in 2024. Hong kong: although francis's visa to stay in hong kong was rejected, francis continues to invest into the leaders in hong kong via zoom meetings and calls. The church planting work in hong kong continues, with believers on the ground serving in the poorest areas of the city. Kardia: at the end of 2022, crazy love was connected with two amazing ministry partners, vincent and joanna vitale, who are oxford trained scholars in the areas of apologetics and biblical studies. Their vision is to imagine apologetics for a new generation of skeptics-to address their unique questions and doubts. Crazy love has been partnering with them to build their vision. Kardia ministries started spinning off from crazy love in 2023 and became their own 501(c)(3) non-profit in 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 72
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 43.2%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 62.7%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.59; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 43.2% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $109K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.