Craneware Cares Charitable Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 831544053
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2019–2020
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2020
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone: 4043642033
Rating: 45
Verdict: MIXED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue: $17,420
Expenses: $17,353
Assets: $67
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

Craig Preston (Director)
Veronica Anzalone (Director)
Kieth Neilson (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Raise funds to support various causes as identified by the Craneware Cares members for Craneware Inc.

What it reported doing in 2020

Alex Lemonade Fanconi Anemia American Heart Down Syndrome Assoc

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 0
Transparency & Controls: 100
Sustainability: 38
Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 71.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 7 filed program accomplishments
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.