Craig Walker Coaching Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932244065
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Wills Point, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7192166545
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,584
- Expenses
- $68,464
- Assets
- $2,896
- Liabilities
- $3,050
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Craig C Walker (President)
People named in this filing
- Craig C Walker (President)
- Josh Price (Secretary)
- Ryan Fletcher (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Craig Walker Coachings mission is to help men overcome shame and self-doubt so they can become confident and influential husbands, fathers, and leaders. The organization fulfills this mission through a 16-week one-on-one coaching program (Truly a Masterpiece), and a weekly small group support group (Masterpiece Brotherhood)an ongoing community gathering that promotes personal and spiritual growth rooted in the principles and truths taught in the Truly a Masterpiece program. The Masterpiece Brotherhood also serves as a funnel to onboard new clients to the one to one Truly a Masterpiece training.
What it reported doing in 2025
Coaching and Training Program: Craig Walker Coaching provides a 16-week one-on-one coaching program designed to help men overcome shame and self-doubt and develop a Christ-centered identity. Expenses support coaching time, curriculum development, and participant support, including need-based scholarships to make the program accessible. Revenue, if any, is generated through participant contributions and donations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 16
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.3%; rating input score 16
- Program expense ratio: 14.7%; rating input score 15
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.2%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -22.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -89.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.3% of revenue deployed · 14.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.