Craftsmen Lodge No 717 Af& Am
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911836524
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3148323977
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $78,339
- Expenses
- $130,462
- Assets
- $2,420,367
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- THOMAS KUHN (TRUSTEE)
- NEAL LETURNO (TRUSTEE)
- MONTE RUSSELL (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The lodge is a fraternal charitable organization operating under a charter from the grand lodge of ancient free and accepted masons of Missouri the lodge meets on a regular basis and contibutes to local individuals, charties, youth groups and other groups.
What it reported doing in 2024
Create partnership program with the masonic home of Missouri resulted in a donation of $800 from an ourside party to result in a donation of $2400 to hnor flights of st louis
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 12
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.5%; rating input score 16
- Program expense ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 9
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -66.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.55; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.5% of revenue deployed · 9.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 98 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.