Craft Community Care Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201483590
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Pittsburg, CA, USA
Phone
9252529199
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Day Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$983,491
Expenses
$907,813
Assets
$1,097,274
Liabilities
$210,190

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Theresa Miller (Executive Director)
  • Anita Roberts (President)
  • Damon Herron (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • James L Craft (CFO): $86,653 total reported compensation
  • Theresa Miller (Executive Director): $17,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

STS Academys mission is to bridge the gap between inner-city youth who prosper and benefit from the public school system and those who struggle and sometimes fail.

What it reported doing in 2024

21st CENTURY - HIGH SCHOOL YOUTH. During the last school year, the organization provided activities and services to about 3,500 students from the two local high schools before and after school. A primary program to all students is a drivers education course, a free course to students. A primary program at Black Diamond Continuation High School was the Job Readiness Program, additional activities included, before school social emotional learning and support (wellness check), Cultural Awareness programs, academic support and Evening School Snacks were nutritional snacks are provided afterschool before evening school begins. At Pittsburg High School several career and employment pathway programs were taught after school, pathway programs, fun enrichment classes and academic assistance and academic assistance in many different forms and areas. Teens2Teach are high school youth who excel in school, they are given training and work experience as tutors and in return they help other students in the district who are struggling. The organization assists coaches in helping student athletes see the importance of being a good student as well as a good athlete. The organization mentors and tutors athletes daily to help reduce academic struggle. We have programming at a reduced level in the summertime. Teen Center - The organization also sponsors a teen center where teens can play games, exercise, have healthy snacks after school, all to maintain a fun safe environment for students after the school day ends.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.2%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $59.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.2% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $748K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.