CRACK House Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204297151
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6147742661
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $132,932
- Expenses
- $77,070
- Assets
- $234,617
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mitchell Ellison (President)
People named in this filing
- Mitchell Ellison (President)
- Jo Ann Leathers (Secretary)
- Steve Rayo (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
C.R.A.C.K. House Ministries (CHM) provides for a lifetime of recovery built upon a spiritual foundation. We seek to draw people in the Linden area and other areas of Central Ohio to Jesus Christ, who gives the power to abstain from drug and alcohol addictions and to gain and maintain freedom from those addictions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Chm provides a youth focused after school boxing program open to kids 8-18. The program assists with many practical needs including after school supeversion, instruction, encouragement, and drug and alcohol prevention in a postive activity based environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41%; rating input score 41
- Program expense ratio: 70.7%; rating input score 71
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.04; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41% of revenue deployed · 70.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.