Cpp Band Boosters Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271639290
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Corning, NY, USA
Phone
6075425118
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$91,713
Expenses
$57,212
Assets
$204,005
Liabilities
$41,742

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENISE PERRY (PRESIDENT BEGINNING 1/1/2025)
  • CIJI REMICK SHEREMETA (VICE PRESIDENT BEGINNING 1/1/2025)
  • TAMMY DAVIS (PRESIDENT THROUGH 12/31/2024)
  • GEORGE KAUFFMAN (VICE PRESIDENT THROUGH 12/31/2024)

People named in this filing

  • DENISE PERRY (PRESIDENT BEGINNING 1/1/2025)
  • CIJI REMICK SHEREMETA (VICE PRESIDENT BEGINNING 1/1/2025)
  • JANET LANDOLF (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the activities of the band department of corning painted posthigh school.

What it reported doing in 2024

Promote and encourage participation in corning painted post high school band through providing material, financial and moral support

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 85% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.5%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.6%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.57; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.5% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.