Cplc Texas Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844125422
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022570700
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Urban, Community Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,385,800
- Expenses
- $8,331,637
- Assets
- $44,544,526
- Liabilities
- $49,196,486
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID ADAME (FORMER CHAIR (THRU 11/23)): $1,099,077 total reported compensation
- ALICIA NUNEZ (CHAIR): $594,063 total reported compensation
- ANDRES CONTRERAS (VICE CHAIR): $429,197 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A Texas non-profit corporation creating opportunities for direct services relative to economic development, education, housing and real estate operations, integrated health and human services and social services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Tx battle cry veteran social services program the staff sergeant fox suicide prevention (ssg fox) program is a proactive, person-centered initiative dedicated to safeguarding the mental health and well-being of service members and their families. Rooted in the belief that strength includes asking for help, the program creates a culture of awareness, connection, and resilience. Through education, early intervention, and peer support, the program empowers individuals at every level to recognize warning signs, reduce stigma surrounding mental health challenges, and take meaningful action when someone is in need. Central to the program is a comprehensive approach that combines training, outreach, and leadership engagement. Participants are equipped with practical tools to identify risk factors, initiate supportive conversations, and connect individuals to appropriate resources. The program emphasizes shared responsibility, reinforcing that suicide prevention is not solely a medical concern but a collective mission that thrives on trust, accountability, and compassion. Honoring the legacy of ssg fox, the program stands as a commitment to never leave a teammate behind. It serves as both a preventive shield and a lifeline ensuring that hope, support, and help are always within reach. By strengthening resilience and promoting a climate of care, the ssg fox suicide prevention program strives to save lives and build a force where every individual feels valued, heard, and supported. Key services provided by ssg fox include: equine therapy: uses research tested, guided interactions with horses to promote emotional healing, build trust, and support mental well-being. Massage therapy: uses therapeutic touch to reduce stress, relieve muscle tension, and support overall physical and mental well-being. Peer support: provides shared understanding and encouragement through connection with others who have lived similar experiences, creating hope and resilience amongst veterans. Case management: personalized support to address barriers to mental health, including employment, benefits navigation, and access to healthcare. Temporary financial assistance: assistance with food insecurities, uniforms for work, utilities, and other critical needs to help stabilize mental health. Community partnerships: collaboration with local organizations and va resources to deliver holistic support tailored to individual needs. The program directly served 80 veterans, impacted 47 family members, and supported 120 individuals through indirect services such as resource navigation, peer to peer services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 37
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.2%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -54.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.35; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.1; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -62.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -32% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $169K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 91 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.