Cplc Refugee and Humanitarian Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883598841
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022570700
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Migration, Refugee Issues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,839,753
- Expenses
- $19,001,752
- Assets
- $2,082,843
- Liabilities
- $1,971,869
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID ADAME (CHAIR THRU 10/23): $1,099,077 total reported compensation
- ALICIA NUNEZ (CHAIR AS OF 6/24): $594,063 total reported compensation
- MAX GONZALES (SECRETARY): $426,343 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization provides short-term refugee resettlement facilities for unaccompanied children.
What it reported doing in 2024
Office of refugee resettlement (orr): in 2022 cplc was awarded a contract with the office of refugee resettlement (orr). Within our orr programming, cplc utilizes a cottage style setting in 2 separate sites in Texas with most services located on campus. Our el paso shelter is funded to serve 24 unaccompanied children and our los fresnos shelter is funded to serve 12 children, however both locations have the capacity to expand and serve more children if needed. Services are provided in a safe and nurturing environment focused on supporting whole-child wellness through exemplary, trauma informed, best-practices, with an overall goal of reunification with guardian or sponsor.(continued on schedule o)recreation and leisure time activities include daily outdoor play, at least one hour of large muscle activity and one hour of structured leisure time activities. Activities are scheduled for at least three hours a day when school is not in session. Case managers meet with children at least once each week and complete all steps required to safely release each child within 30 days of referral. Safety and well being calls are conducted 30 days after release and outcomes documented in the child's case file. Education services are provided each weekday, year-round, for at least six hours. Group counseling sessions take place twice a week at a minimum. Individual counseling takes place at least once each week facilitated by the clinical department and cplc to maintain confidential and secure, comprehensive, accurate, and up-to-date case files and electronic records for all children. Care provider ensures the case management department work with all departments to identify what options are in the best interest of the children and gather all information required by orr in order to present the best viable options for the uc in accordance with orr policy safe and timely release from orr care as well as any state licensing requirements. The overall goal is for the safe and timely release of all children whether it be through reunification, repatriation, or other long-term placement options. In 2023, cplc was awarded another contract with orr to provide home study and post release services (hsprs). We are contracted to serve a total of 1,570 minors across several states: 262 in New York, 476 in chicago, 474 in Texas, and 358 in California and Arizona. While children are under orr custody in shelter placements, the care provider screens each case to determine if a home study is required under the trafficking victims protection reauthorization act of 2008 (tvpra) or orr policy. These cases are classified as tvpra, mandated, or discretionary. The hsprs division assists care providers in conducting the requested home study. The gathered information is used to submit the case for orr approval and to complete the unification of the child in care. Once an unaccompanied child is released from orr custody to a sponsor, orr provides post-release services (prs) to support the child's transition into the community. All released children are eligible for prs, which includes safety assessments and psychoeducation for both the child and the sponsor. Prs providers address key issues such as the impact of prolonged separation, changes to family dynamics, and trauma from violence to ensure a stable and secure home environment. Orr provides three levels of prs: level one includes virtual check-ins, level two offers case management services, which provide referrals and connections to community resources, and level three delivers intensive in-home engagements for children who need more specialized support to overcome specific challenges. These services are offered by a network of orr-funded non-profit providers across the united states. Orr requires the use of evidence-based child welfare best practices that are culturally and linguistically appropriate to the unique needs of each child, grounded in a trauma-informed approach. Prs providers may also assist released c
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 37
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.95; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 55.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 53% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -35.6% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $373K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 80 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.