Cphs Boys Hockey Booster Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200378497
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Champlin, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6125548915
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $103,515
- Expenses
- $95,180
- Assets
- $57,906
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDY LONG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANDY LONG (PRESIDENT)
- JEN LONG (VICE PRESIDE)
- MELISSA CARLSON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the cphs boys hockey booster club is to enhance player experience, enrich player growth, and engage our youth. The club is made up of player parents and run by an elected board of directors. Booster club fees cover the costs of coaching, uniforms, apparel, player development, events, travel, meals, and giving back to the community through events and outreach programs.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the year, varsity and jv players mentored youth through the cpyha program and participated in community volunteer events. The program organized team meals, travel for out-of-town games, photo day, senior night, youth night, alumni game, and the end-of-year banquet. Players supported youth engagement through a mite vs varsity game and assisted in fundraising effors and team-building events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.7%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 97.5%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.7% of revenue deployed · 97.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $93K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.