Coyote Task Force Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860679405
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5208845553
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Employment Procurement Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,720,659
- Expenses
- $1,769,093
- Assets
- $1,711,007
- Liabilities
- $197,009
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LEONARD TEIBER (PRESIDENT)
- JEFFREY GROBE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFFREY GROBE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $133,493 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support and promote services, public awareness, training, employment and stability for individuals with serious mental illness.
What it reported doing in 2024
Coyote task force (ctf) was created to support and promote services, public awareness, training, employment, and opportunities for adults recovering from serious mental illness. Ctf provides a safe space, community and job support, and life skills to those with smi, sa and those on the spectrum. We are based on the ideas of the fountain house in nyc. There are currently over 500 clubhouses around the world that offer employment and community support. Ctf has two primary program services: our place clubhouse and cafe 54.***our place clubhouse***this program provides psych-social, pre-vocational and vocational rehabilitation services to adults with serious mental illnesses. Within the clubhouse, vocational services include job development, placement, work adjustment and supported employment.opc has seen successful placements for members in a variety of fields including retail, entertainment, call centers, restaurants, business offices, and customer service industries, among others. Should a member ever need support, our motto is 'once a member, always a member'.during the pandemic, ctf has stepped up and offered telephonic peer and employment support to members who are homebound due to safety concerns and covid restrictions. We have also delivered food to members in need, provided support scheduling testing and vaccines and have educated members on ways to be safe while also being able to live their lives as 'normally' as possible. We have continued our training program(s) and educated trainees in how to work safely during the pandemic. We have also continued to offer employment support for those who want to work and are able to do so safely. We have adapted our holiday schedules and procedures so that we can accommodate those members who needed support during that season as well.***cafe 54***one in four adults (approximately 43.8 million americans) experiences a mental health disorder in a given year. 80% of individuals with a mental health disorder want to work. At a time when jobs are hard to come by, coyote task force offers individuals recovering from mental illnesses opportunities to reclaim their lives in a nurturing, creative environment. The vocational rehabilitation and employment programs of coyote task force are components of our mission to reduce and ultimately eliminate the misconceptions surrounding psychiatric disorders by showing that people with mental illness can and do lead productive lives. Currently, cafe 54 experiences about 50% success rate for their trainees obtaining full or part-time employment. This supports the opc philosophy of advocating for the idea that individuals recovering from mental illnesses are valued members of society who should be treated with the respect afforded to the other community members. Mental illness is not a roadblock to being a contributing, successful part of our society.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.