Cox-monett Hospital Auxiliary

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431852817
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
Phone
4173641409
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,718
Expenses
$12,941
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BARBARA HUFFMAN (PRESIDENT END 12/17)
  • BETH GANN (VICE PRES; PRESIDENT BEG 01/18)
  • KATHY FERTIG (VICE PRESIDENT BEG 01/18)

People named in this filing

  • BARBARA HUFFMAN (PRESIDENT END 12/17)
  • BETH GANN (VICE PRES; PRESIDENT BEG 01/18)
  • BONNIE MURRAY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The cox monett hospital auxiliary's primary purpose is to operate the gift shop. Funds from the gift shop are used to provide much needed equipment, supplies, or renovations to cox-monett hospital.

What it reported doing in 2017

The cox monett auxiliary represents a strong group who believes in the mission of coxhealth, and provides both financial and service donations to cox monett hospital. The auxiliary was established in 1944. Auxilians serve in various areas of the hospital, clinics and at community events. The auxiliary provides support for hospital equipment and projects, health care scholarships, and complimentary baby caps for every baby born at cox monett hospital. Support comes from auxiliary members, employees, community, contributions, gift shop and fundraising projects.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.1%; rating input score 41
  • Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.5%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.1% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.