Covia Communities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 946130471
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-T 2021
- Location
- Glendale, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9259567400
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $275,832,129
- Expenses
- $144,169,290
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
40 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John Woodward (CEO)
- Sally Plank (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- Linda Hibbs (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WH)
- Christina Spence (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SFT)
- Elvyra Abare (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CW)
Highest reported compensation
- John Woodward (CEO): $1,042,970 total reported compensation
- Diana Jamison (TREASURER, CFO): $766,608 total reported compensation
- Eduardo Salvador (CFO): $592,875 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Covia promotes and cultivates healthy communities for positive aging through an innovative continuum that actively supports the whole person.
What it reported doing in 2021
For more than 50 years, covia has been a leading nonprofit provider of housing and services for older adults in the bay area. Our mission is to promote positive aging by cultivating healthy and engaged communities with a continuum of innovative services that actively support the whole person. In addition to providing housing through our 13 communities, 8 of which are affordable communities, covia serves more than 18,000 older adults through our community services division's innovative programs, including: (1) home match shared housing provides economic stability and enhanced wellbeing for older adult home providers who offer rooms in their homes in exchange for additional income, help around the house in return for lower rents, and/or companionship. Currently available in marin county, san francisco (sf), contra costa county, and alameda county (fremont). (2) well connected offers more than 80 weekly activities, classes and support groups through free telephone conference and video calls in english and spanish. (3) social call (sc) is a friendly visiting program that began in sf in 2009. Sc makes thoughtful and precise matches between community volunteers and older adults 1:1 for weekly social visits, in-person or by phone. Phone visits anywhere in the us, inperson visits in sf, alameda, marin & sonoma counties. Sc knows older age is a time of creative growth and we want volunteers (often much younger) and participants to find equity and meaningful connection during their visits, with the ultimate goal of reducing loneliness. (4) market day: 24 weekly markets are located at senior centers, affordable senior housing communities, community centers, and faith-based organizations across California that provide fresh fruit and vegetables at wholesale prices along with volunteer opportunities and a social gathering. (5) senior resources provides information and referral assistance and emergency funding in seven counties. Emergency funds are designed to be disbursed on a one-time basis, to provide safety net funding for expenses such as: rent, utilities, car repair, household repairs, medical/dental expenses etc. Three counties have additional unique programs tailored to the specific needs of each county, that is, rotary home team in contra costa county and pantry of home in alameda county. (6) creative spark is a new program inspired by ruth's table at bethany center in san francisco which is founded on creative aging principles of culture shift, be well, grow, and connect. Creative spark intends to package the success and impact of ruth's table, and bring it to a larger community, other residences, aging services, and older adults through staff training and consultation, creative aging curriculum, art kits, and virtual classes with older adults.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.3%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 96.8%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.7%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.3% of revenue deployed · 96.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $139.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 40 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 19 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.