Covenant House Texas

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760050882
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
Location
Houston, Texas, US
Phone
713-523-2231
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,562,249
Expenses
$9,888,935
Assets
$59,734,482
Liabilities
$9,257,668

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM BEDROSSIAN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • KRISTA THOMPSON (CEO, CH-TX THRU MAY 2025)
  • ANTHONY FLYNN (CEO, CH-TX AS OF MAY 2025)
  • LESLIE BOURNE (FORMER CEO, CH-TX)

Highest reported compensation

  • WILLIAM BEDROSSIAN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $535,850 total reported compensation
  • LESLIE BOURNE (FORMER CEO, CH-TX): $274,889 total reported compensation
  • DELESHA JONES (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $175,434 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are the voice for homeless youth. Covenant House Texas offers an extensive continuum of care model for homeless youth.

What it reported doing in 2024

Covenant house Texas also provided the following comprehensive services to homeless and runaway youth under the age of 24: medical services: comprehensive medical care is provided through the cht clinic. Health services begin as each youth admitted to the shelter receives a physical examination. The clinic is staffed by licensed nurses and residents supervised by a physician from the baylor college of medicine. In addition to the treatment of illnesses and minor injuries, services also include sexually transmitted disease detection, treatment, and prevention; HIV testing, counseling, and referral information; immunization; mental health and substance abuse counseling and referral for dental and eye care.rights of passage: the rights of passage (rop) is a transitional housing program which allows young people to refine their independent living skills up to two years. They learn to budget, manage money and have a true understanding of the expenses and experiences of living in an apartment. With the assistance of rop staff, they learn life skills and focus on steady employment. All rop participants work, attend school or a vocational training program. Youth are also encouraged to save a portion of their income for their first apartment. We currently average about 16 youths daily.youth engagement center: the youth engagement center (yec) provides a safe, welcoming space for young people ages 18-24, offering daily drop-in services and emergency overnight support. Designed to meet both immediate needs and longer-term goals, the yec ensures youth have access to essential resources in an environment that values their dignity and potential. Drop-in services: open daily youth can take a shower, enjoy a nutritious meal, do laundry, rest, and access additional supportive services. Youth engagement specialists are available to meet individual needs, provide guidance, and ensure every young person feels seen and supported. Emergency overnight services: youth may participate in a lottery to secure a spot for overnight shelter, with priority given to youth who are employed or enrolled full time in school. Youth receive meals, hygiene supplies, laundry services, and access to clothing and shoes, as well as medical and mental health support, case management, and assistance with housing, education, and employment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.04; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 69% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $536K · 31 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $27.1M reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 25 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.