Covenant House New Jersey Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133537710
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Newark, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9732863406
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,100,850
- Expenses
- $16,798,081
- Assets
- $21,338,902
- Liabilities
- $4,804,105
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM BEDROSSIAN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- JULIA EINBOND (CEO, CH-NJ)
- MARY M MACDONALD (FORMER ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM BEDROSSIAN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $535,850 total reported compensation
- JULIA EINBOND (CEO, CH-NJ): $294,992 total reported compensation
- JAMES WHITE (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $244,577 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
Covenant house New Jersey takes pride in its behavioral health department which provides an essential service within a safe and trusting environment so our youth can overcome the obstacles they face. Through early intervention and personalized care, youth are able to approach their treatment with confidence. Chnj provides on-site group and individual counseling as well as access to a consulting psychiatric apn. This extra level of mental healthcare, in addition to medical care helps youth meet their goals and overcome barriers to treatment. - street and community outreach: street outreach teams actively seek out young people experiencing homelessness who may need help. The team assists with critical safety needs by providing transportation to a safe shelter. Young people living on the streets can receive food, water, hygiene kits, clothing, blankets, and referrals to services such as shelter, medical care, employment, and education services. In fy25, we reached 242 youth in direct street outreach. - young families program: our program dedicated to serving young families is raphael's life house. In this program, our expecting or parenting young moms between the ages of 18-21 live with us for up to 18 months and receive 3 months of aftercare support once they leave. The goals of rlh are to provide a safe, stable, living environment; to help young mothers develop skills for maintaining housing, self-sufficiency, and productivity in the community; and to support young women and their babies with aftercare services once they move on from rlh. We also provide emergency shelter to parenting young moms at our emergency shelter in atlantic city. In fy25, we provided 66 young moms and 84 children with safe and supportive housing. 86% of our families exited to stable living environments. - nancy's place: the nancy's place program provides supportive housing for youth with mental health disorders. In fy25, we served 13 youth. 80% exited to stable living environments. - permanent housing: the permanent housing program provides housing to youth and young families through scattered-site apartments, where they receive ongoing case management and landlord relationship navigation. In these programs a portion of youth's rent is covered by a sponsoring agency through a variety of government funding sources. We served approximately 193 people across our various permanent housing programs during fy25 -human trafficking victim services (htvs): chnj is the statewide provider of services for victims and survivors of human trafficking. The htvs team provides case management and linkage to resources for survivors throughout all 21 counties in the state. Services are available for all survivors regardless of housing status, age, gender identity or expression, foreign and domestic victims and all trafficking types. In fy25, the htvs program served 216 people. In addition to case management and linkage services, chnj has outreach staff working to identify potential victims and providing education in the community about human trafficking, as well as a licensed social worker providing behavioral health services to victims.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.4% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $14.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $536K · 33 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $823K reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 25 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.