Courageous Healers Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274159302
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- La Quinta, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7607025498
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Sexual Abuse, Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,473
- Expenses
- $7,142
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $14,150
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RANDALL L BOYD (President)
People named in this filing
- RANDALL L BOYD (President)
- ALLYSSA TACKMAN (Chairman)
- JARED TACKMAN (Chairman)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide a safe and loving facility for boys and men to heal from the devastating effects of child abuse, primary sexual and including physical, emotional/mental and spiritual abuse, using professional therapists who specialize in the field of abuse, practicing the spiritual values and principles that no matter what has happened to us or what we have done, we are all children of god and are loved un-conditionally by god with no judgment.
What it reported doing in 2023
The specific purpose of this corporation is to provide charitable assistance, educational services, and prevent cruelty to children in connection with sexual abuse suffered by persons served within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code, or corresponding section of any future federal tax code.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -105.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.