Courage Schools Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853795659
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sandy Springs, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4704472130
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Primary, Elementary Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,385,846
- Expenses
- $1,748,617
- Assets
- $3,041,413
- Liabilities
- $915,275
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MARY E MCPHERSON (PRESIDENT & HEAD OF SCHOOL)
Highest reported compensation
- DR MARY E MCPHERSON (PRESIDENT & HEAD OF SCHOOL): $185,406 total reported compensation
- MICKY IRWIN (TREASURER, COO): $110,104 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Courage Schools services rising K through 7th grade students who have a diagnosed language difference such as dyslexia and dysgraphia.
What it reported doing in 2024
Courage schools services rising k through 7th grade students who have a diagnosed language difference such as dyslexia and dysgraphia. Courage schools is a remediation program for students with language based learning differences such as dyslexia, dysgraphia, expressive/receptive language disorder, etc. Courage's focus is to remediate students within a two to four year time frame so students are able to transition to a mainstream school. In addition, courage is a steam program as the learning profile of its students tends to also include steam based thinking as a strength.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.2%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.7%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 35.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 35.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 31.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.2% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $185K · 9 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.