County Treasurers Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232550694
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Butler, PA, USA
Phone
7242845150
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$197,136
Expenses
$169,447
Assets
$339,457
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cindy Creveling (President)
  • Christine Kryzysiak (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Cindy Creveling (President)
  • Erica Rocchi Brusselars (First VP)
  • Krista Potter (2nd VP)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Association exemption exists per the County Code for education purposes as a governmental agency of elected county treasurers throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

What it reported doing in 2025

Held a 4 day convention in 2023 in Harrisburg PA with 41 counties attending and 59 treasury officials in attendance. Total association guest was 81 and 38 financial services vendors and providers also in attendance. Two seminars were held in State College. One was held in the spring and the other in the fall with 45 counties attending. The Association met with the PA agencies, Game Commission, Fish & Boat Commission and the Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement. Legislations was reviewed along with any new regulations that effect the county treasurers' office across the commonwealth.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.3%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 100% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.3% of revenue deployed · 56.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $96K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.