County Probation Consortium
Legal name: County Probation Consortium Partnering for Youth Realignment
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880673741
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Sacramento, California, USA
- Phone
- 9164472762
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Government and Public Administration
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $367,156
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
59 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark Bonini (President)
- Esa Ehmen Krause (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mark Bonini (President)
- TR Merickel (Secretary)
- Richard Muench (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve as an inter-county collaborative resource for local probation departments in their efforts to serve youth with intense and complex needs who are ordered by the juvenile court into a secure youth treatment facility.
What it reported doing in 2025
In the face of the closure of the states juvenile justice facilities (DJJ), the Consortium provided an opportunity for counties to share ideas about addressing the needs of youth who were returning from DJJ or who would have otherwise gone to DJJ so that each county did not have to reinvent the wheel when deciding on their plan for the closure of DJJ. For example, the Consortium developed a draft MOU template that counties could consider using when they did not have the necessary resources within their own county and needed to contract with another countys secure youth treatment facility. The Consortium contracted with the states Office of Youth and Community Restoration to assist counties with identifying and addressing the needs of youth returning from DJJ. For example, the Consortium was able to solicit common questions or challenges that counties were facing during this uncertain period and work with directly with DJJ and OYCR to develop strategies to address those concerns. This would have been nearly impossible, and significantly more costly for the counties and state agencies, if each county had been required to coordinate and problem-solve individually with DJJ and OYCR.Additionally, the Consortium was able to identify shared strategies that counties could use for the transition processesstrategies that had to be developed because there were so many unanswered questions created by the states decision to close its juvenile justice facilities.In June 2023, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution authorizing dissolution of the corporation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 2
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -93.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -63.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 2.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 59 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.