Country Valley Industries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223081071
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Binghamton, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6077238361
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,243
- Expenses
- $619,969
- Assets
- $3,038,051
- Liabilities
- $469,293
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID CHAMBERS (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES PEDUTO (VICE PRESIDENT)
- AMY HOWARD (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- AMY HOWARD (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $257,453 total reported compensation
- ANN YEAGER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $142,406 total reported compensation
- JILL LOVUOLO (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $92,421 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To acquire, renovate, own, maintain and operate real property as community residences and day habilitation facilities within the broome-tioga counties area of New York state for developmentally disabled adults.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rental activity - holds property to be used as residences and day habilitation services for intellectually & developmentally disabled adults within a community based setting. 314 clients served.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 73% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,240.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.9; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $620K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $257K · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.