Council on International Non-Theatrical Events Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 526057018
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 5074002463
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Film, Video
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $138,731
- Expenses
- $154,524
- Assets
- $9,164
- Liabilities
- $34,132
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bill Gardner (President)
- John L Simson (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Bill Gardner (President)
- John L Simson (Vice President)
- Endyia Kinney-Sterns (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
CINE builds and supports a community of professional, emerging and student film, television and digital content creators through the CINE Golden Eagle Awards, events such as CINE PitchFest and CINE Celebrates, the Marvin Hamlisch Film Scoring Contest, and related skill-building programming.
What it reported doing in 2017
CINE builds and supports a community of film, television and digital content creators, with a special emphasis on creating educational and networking opportunities for emerging, independent and student media makers with programs such as CINE PitchFest, in which 15 producers receive the opportunity to pitch ideas to A&E Netwrk (and students are given free tickets to attend); CINE Celebrates, to which student media makers are invited to attend and network with distinquished media mentors; and the Marvin Hamlisch Film Scoring Contest for Emerging Composers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 14
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.6%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 13.1%; rating input score 13
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.72; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -92.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.6% of revenue deployed · 13.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.