Council on Diagnosis and Internal Disorders

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942592662
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
4649279152
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$161,252
Expenses
$154,401
Assets
$158,117
Liabilities
$774

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR RHONDA BUTTON (PRESIDENT)
  • DR MICHELLE JOURDAN (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

People named in this filing

  • DR RHONDA BUTTON (PRESIDENT)
  • DR MICHELLE JOURDAN (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • DR CHRIS MURRAY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The american chiropractic association's council on diagnosis and internal disorders (cdid) was established in 1985. This council was created to assist board certified chiropractic internists with education, certification, and recredentialing, in addition to helping these diplomates maintain high standards of patient care.

What it reported doing in 2024

The council on diagnosis and internal disorders (cdid) is a professional and educational non-profit organization with a growing membership of active chiropractors who have advanced training in the diagnosing and treatment of a broad spectrum of conditions and diseases. The cdid (a certified specialty council of the american chiropractic association or aca) administers and coordinates the activity of the dabci post-doctoral specialty. Diplomate in diagnosis and internal disorders (dabci)these board certified internists are trained in and utilize the current medical diagnostic tools as well as specialized functional diagnostics. Dabci physicians routinely employ methods such as blood laboratory studies, urinalyses, electrocardiograms, vascular doppler ultrasound, spirometry, dexa bone density testing, salivary assay hormonal and neurotransmitter tests, igg food allergy testing, diagnostic imaging to include x-ray, ct, mri, comprehensive gastrointestinal stool analyses, and many other diagnostic tools. A dabci uses therapeutic methods which emphasize conservative and minimally invasive approaches and minimize risk to the patient. Diplomates in diagnosis and internal disorders use treatments such as clinical nutrition, dietetics, exercise, vitamin and mineral supplementation, homeopathic medicine, botanical medicine, acupuncture, natural hormone replacement, and pharmacologic counseling. Many conditions and disease states can be resolved by utilizing these natural methods. The council on diagnosis of internal disorders promotes our physicians as uniquely qualified to provide this type of comprehensive natural medical care. Qualificationsa dabci certification (diplomate of the american board of chiropractic internists) requires doctors to attend and complete a 300 hour post doctorate course (classes), pass a national certification examination and requires 12 hours of continuing education in advanced coursework each year. The dabci program is recognized by the american chiropractic association (aca) and certified by the board of chiropractic internists. The dabci program is also one of 6 programs recognized and approved by the american board of chiropractic specialties (abcs).

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.4%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 89.2%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.4% of revenue deployed · 89.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.