Council for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect of Jackson Cnty
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382331754
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Jackson, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5177884239
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $81,174
- Expenses
- $72,996
- Assets
- $97,978
- Liabilities
- $543
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- CATHI KELLEY (CHAIR)
- NICHOLAS BUTTERFIELD (TREASURER)
- MARGARITA BERKEMEIER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Primary exempt purpose to educate and strengthen the community to reduce child abuse and neglect. Cpcan strives to prevent the maltreatment of children before it happens through advocacy, collaborative efforts, and by offering programs to the community including, a. Stewards of children - child sexual abuse prevention training for adults b. Mandated reporter training - teaching how to recongize and report suspected maltreatment of children c. Annual trainings for professionals d. Trauncy prevention programs in conjunction with the jackson family court e. Safe sleep - to protect infants from sleep related death f. Period of purple crying - to protect infants from sleep shaken baby syndrome g. Community education - offer presentations and child safety and parent educational info
What it reported doing in 2025
Stewards of children - training adults in child sexual abuse prevention mandated reporter training - presentations result in adults trained in recongizing and reported suspected child maltreatment to child protective services annual professional trainings for social workers, teachers, and other professionals - training in recongizing child abuse and neglect strong nurturing fathers program provided education to improve the parenting skills of fathers - this program provided fathers with methods to strengthen their relationships with their children period of purple crying - presentations for new parents and caregivers to prevent shaken baby syndrome
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.5%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 37.3%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.1%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 45.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.5% of revenue deployed · 37.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $27K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.