Council for Exceptional Children

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
520886495
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
7036203660
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,966,249
Expenses
$8,068,229
Assets
$4,684,846
Liabilities
$3,323,168

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JULIE IRENE BOST (PRESIDENT)
  • BENJAMIN TILLOTSON (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • KAREEM THOMPSON (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • CHAD RUMMEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & SECRETARY)
  • LAURIE VANDERPLOEG (ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHAD RUMMEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & SECRETARY): $338,862 total reported compensation
  • SHARYN WEISS (DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS): $217,558 total reported compensation
  • CRAIG EVANS (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $216,463 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cultivating, supporting, and empowering education professionals who work with individuals with disabilities by: advocating for education professionals and for individuals with disabilities, and/or gifts and talents; advancing professional practice and scholarly research; promoting diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility; building networks, partnerships, and communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Outreach: professional preparation standards: the council for exceptional children's professional preparation standards define the specialized expertise special educators must master for safe and effective practice. These standards are used to inform special educator preparation programs, accreditation organizations, and credentialing agencies. From our earliest days, we've recognized the critical role of standards in defining special education as a profession. In 1922, at its inaugural meeting, the founders of cec identified the establishment of professional standards as one of the primary aims of the organization. We've embraced this responsibility to have been a leader among education associations in the development of ethical principles, preparation standards, and resources for using the standards. Cec has and continues to use a collaborative process that ensures that its standards are current, research-based, and designed to fully address the knowledge and skills special educators must master.yes i can awards: cec's yes i can awards recognize the accomplishments of students with disabilities who have demonstrated excellence in areas such as academics, arts, self-advocacy, technology, and community service. Each year, cec honors award recipients at its annual convention & expo, celebrating their achievements and sharing their stories with thousands of educators, families, and peers. The program highlights the potential and contributions of young people with disabilities while inspiring educators and communities to continue fostering inclusive opportunities. Through yes i can, cec shines a spotlight on the strengths and successes of students, reinforcing its mission to ensure every child is supported to reach their full potential.diversity leadership academy: cec's diversity leadership academy (dla) develops and empowers special education professionals from historically underrepresented groups to become strong leaders in the field. Through a two year-long program of mentorship, training, and networking, participants build leadership skills, deepen their knowledge of policy and practice, and engage with peers who share a commitment to equity and inclusion. The dla not only supports individual professional growth but also strengthens the profession by ensuring diverse voices and perspectives are represented in leadership roles. By cultivating the next generation of leaders, the program advances cec's mission to create a more inclusive and equitable future for students with disabilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.8%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.8% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $6.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $339K · 22 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $891K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.