Cougar Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452743025
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Campbellsport, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9209484321
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,921
- Expenses
- $24,554
- Assets
- $140,410
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REBECCA BECK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- REBECCA BECK (PRESIDENT)
- LISA FERGUSON (SECRETARY)
- JOY TIMM (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Stimulate the interests and enthusiasm of the people of the campbellsport school district in the campbellsport high school athletic programs and activities thereto, and thereby increase participation in athletics and related activities for the benefit of the boys and girls who are in the athletic programs and related activities of campbellsport high school.
What it reported doing in 2020
Increased participation in school activities by providing equipment and supplies to the cross country, volleyball, basketball, golf, football, soccer, and baseball teams.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.3%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 62.8%; rating input score 63
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -45.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.72; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.3% of revenue deployed · 62.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.