Cottonwood Artists' School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203132668
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
7195201899
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts Education

Reported finances

Revenue
$853,802
Expenses
$871,012
Assets
$2,111,618
Liabilities
$594,290

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENI SMITH (PRESIDENT (AS OF 10/2025))
  • ANNA REVOLINSKY (PRESIDENT & TREASURER (THRU 10/2025))
  • GLENN MCMAHAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JON KHOURY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JON KHOURY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $136,590 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To engage the pikes peak region in art through learning, exhibits, performances, and hosting a diverse creative community of workspace for artists.

What it reported doing in 2025

More than 3,200 students register yearly for cottonwood art classes taught by artists in the building and professionals from the community. A wide range of subjects are offered, including traditional mediums, such as watercolor painting, life drawing, pottery, and printmaking, and more niche courses, poetry and creative writing, wrap jewelry, and stained glass. The center has recently expanded into literary arts, with a monthly open mic for writers and personal narrative classes. Cottonwood also offers film, acting, voice, and music classes. Business classes related to selling art, including website design and marketing, are also available. Additionally, cottonwood is now producing a monthly podcast on the arts. (continued on schedule o)the 134 artists in the building, whose combined rent contributes about $34,000 in monthly income, are diverse in their interests, offerings, and education. The center works to maintain an environment rich with formally educated art students - currently, 14 hold master of fine arts degrees - but it's not a requirement. Those with no formal education are also encouraged to become part of the collective and learn from their more experienced contemporaries. Many participate in monthly critiques and the artist cafe; a space designed to challenge and encourage.multiple galleries throughout the building showcase professional artists and those just finding their footing. Monthly shows feature solo exhibits, group shows, and selective juried shows with a wide range of contemporary themes. Cottonwood also finds innovative ways to make art available, now curating work at the Colorado springs airport and hanging and curating art in 10 buildings around the city. Additional events provide another revenue stream for cottonwood and help connect the center to the community. Offerings include a victory farm and arts market, which brings in many visitors every month of the year. Art parties for kids and adults, live music, spoken word poetry performances, wedding receptions, film screenings and fundraisers are also part of the programming.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.42; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $722K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $137K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.