Cosmopolitan International Elizabeth City Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
566060707
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Elizabeth City, NC, USA
Phone
2523352596
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
International, Foreign Affairs, and National Security N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,854
Expenses
$15,143
Assets
$17,096

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN SHERLOCK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHNNY LANE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRIAN SHERLOCK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TRACY WINSLOW (TREASURER)
  • JOHNNY LANE (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organization operates to raise funds needed to research diabetes and to assist individuals in the community who have the illness. The club is an international organization and the local chapter follows their guidelines. The local chapter is a drop off center for canes, walkers, crutches, commode extensions and bedside commodes. These items are available to the local community on the free loan program. Around the holiday time each year the club donates toys and bicycles to children who come from abusive situations. Non perishable food items are donated to local families in need.

What it reported doing in 2014

Organization operates to raise funds needed to research diabetes and to assist individuals in the community who have the illness. The club is an international organization and the local chapter follows their guidelines. The local chapter is a drop off center for canes, walkers, crutches, commode extensions and bedside commodes. These items are available to the local community on the free loan program. Around the holiday time each year the club donates toys, bicycles to children who come from abusive situations. Non perishable food items are donated to local families in need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.