Corvallis Public Schools Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931208608
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Corvallis, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5417575857
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $900,725
- Expenses
- $884,595
- Assets
- $2,570,624
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Angela Hibbard (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Angela Hibbard (Executive Director): $102,225 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Corvallis Public Schools Foundation is to support Corvallis public schools by providing resources and opportunities that help every student succeed.
What it reported doing in 2024
Academic and Enrichment Grants: IMAGINE grants of $60,845 were used to encourage innovative ideas that advance equity and students' experiences in their school communities such as projects in art, business, music, physical education, gardening, math, reading, writing, science, STEM, and science field trips; and $9,381 was used for 11 YEA! (Youth Empowerment and Action) grants for innovative, student-driven projects to fund projects related to bicycling, ceramics, robotics, field trips, diversity activities, youth government, STEM and sustainability. Other grants included $1,500 for Career Convention, $1,710 for bike education, and $1,700 for a culinary trip. Graduation Rate Intervention funds of $162,000 were used to fund summer classes for students at risk of not graduating from high school on time. These summer programs, which included the subjects of math, literacy, culinary arts, and urban farm, served 450 students, and students earned 86 total high school credits. Also, $14,321 was spent for alternative middle school programs to provide students who face significant barriers to accessing their education such as trauma, poverty, and learning with smaller class sizes and more individual attention; these programs served more than 30 students. Through our Golden Apple Awards program, we awarded four stipends totaling $3,420 to honor outstanding teachers and staff. Through our endowed scholarship program, we awarded scholarships totaling $13,425 to help 13 high school seniors pursue their post-secondary education. In addition, $10,400 was spent for professional development for teachers. Donated services of $1,750 were received for videography for Golden Apple Awards events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.8%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.91; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.6%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.8% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $645K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $102K · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.