Cortland Regional Medical Center Auxiliary Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 160654817
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Cortland, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6077563555
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,360
- Expenses
- $34,358
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DONALD HAY (PRESIDENT)
- JUDITH SWARTWOUT (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- SHEILA KNIGHT (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DONALD HAY (PRESIDENT)
- JUDITH SWARTWOUT (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- SHEILA KNIGHT (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Raise funds to support guthrie cortland medical center, inc. Through cortland memorial foundation, inc.
What it reported doing in 2018
There were 58 active teenage volunteers in 2018. Combined they volunteered a total of 1,614 hours in various departments in the hospital. Scholarships were awarded to several teenage volunteers that met certain criteria. In addition, there were 12 college students that volunteered a total of 1,008 hours in various departments in the hospitalcortland regional medical centerteenage volunteer scholarshipthe hospital auxiliary of guthrie cortland medical center is offering annual scholarships to graduating high school seniors who have served as active members of the teenage volunteer program of their choice providing they are recognized schools or institutions of education beyond the high school level. Technical, trade or vocational schools will be considered.criteria for eligibility: applicants must be a high school senior who is currently active in the teenage volunteer program and must have documentation of acceptance to a college or trade school.the following hours must be donated: average six hours per month in the program, one saturday per month, 40 minimum hours per summer (weekdays) ( exceptions can be made at the discretion of director).performance and attitude will be evaluated, based on grades from individual department managers.tavs that are sons/daughters of auxiliary members, crmc administrators or crmc board members are not eligible for scholarship awards.method of selection: a teenage volunteer committee will be appointed to consider all candidates. This committee will include but is not limited to: two (2) representatives from nursing, two (2) representatives from hospital departments, two (2) representatives from the hospital auxiliary, one (1) teenage volunteer supervisor and the director of volunteers. The chairperson of the hospital auxiliary teenage volunteer committee will preside over all meetings. It is this committee that will make all final selections of the scholarship recipients and the amount of the scholarships.supervisors will be asked to complete a saturday tav report form weekly which will document each tavs attitude and performance. Supervisors are encouraged to make additional comments, which will assist the tav committee in their selection.during the first week in february, the volunteer staff (on behalf of the hospital auxiliary) will review active tav seniors performance records. Scholarship application forms will be mailed directly to each eligible candidate by the second week in february. The application will require that the applicant submit a 150 word essay describing his/her future education goals and why they feel they deserve to be considered for a scholarship. All applications must be returned to the volunteer office by the third week in march.in the first week of april, letters will be mailed to each applicant and respective guidance counselor indicating the date and time of interviews with the scholarship committee. Tav's may have to be excused from school to attend the interview.the scholarship committee will receive a packet, the fourth week of march, containing individual packets for each applicant. This should be reviewed prior to the interviews.interviews shall commence the second week of april. If the committee finds no suitable candidate who meets the established criteria, a non-recommendation should be reported to the hospital board of directors and the hospital auxiliary board of directors.presentation of awards and scholarships: the winner(s) of the scholarship(s) will be announced at the annual teenage volunteer awards ceremony held on the last sunday of april. Any money donated by a private party will be given directly to the recipient(s) on that evening. The scholarship(s) from the auxiliary will be presented in letter form only. The payment of funds will be given directly to the recipient's school in two equal installments upon receiving a copy of each semester's bill. The first half of the scholarship is being paid in august and the second half is being paid in januar
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.1%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 24.2%; rating input score 24
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.1% of revenue deployed · 24.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.