Corrie Ten Boom Fellowship
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752671293
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Colleyville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8172676539
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Leadership Development
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,127,695
- Expenses
- $12,329,562
- Assets
- $897,092
- Liabilities
- $878,509
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAROLYN EVANS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLYN EVANS (PRESIDENT): $3,515 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To pray for the peace of jerusalem, to educate and encourage others to pray and share god's love with the jewish people, and to carry out the vision of the ten boom family
What it reported doing in 2024
Corrie ten boom fellowship educated prayer partners through many educational products, including over 101 million emails sent out in 2024 and several newly published and updated books: "end times and armageddon- and revision of "why was i born?". "hiding place" virtual tour continues to be viewed online in 20 languages at virtualtour.corrietenboom.com. Several educational spots were posted on social media about holocaust survivors and the october 7th attack by hamas. Ctbf continues to combat anti-semitism. The organization helped fund the friends of zion (foz) museum located in jerusalem, which had 4,759 virtual tours. The foz museum was open to the public, except on shabbot, in 2024 and received visitors from many different countries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 75
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.98; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $11.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $4K · 4 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $7.5M reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.