Corporate Alliance for Drug Education

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232433673
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2159250643
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,587,608
Expenses
$1,160,601
Assets
$1,312,563
Liabilities
$126,792

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FREDERICK KOHM JR (PRESIDENT)
  • LAUREN DOLAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAUREN DOLAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $102,258 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organization's mission: the mission of cadekids is to promote children's potential for growth through comprehensive, school-based and community-based youth development and support programs that are begun at an early age and are designed to encourage positive choices, while reducing high risk behaviors.

What it reported doing in 2024

Cadekids is a prevention education and student support organization. Cadekids operates 3 core programs classroom prevention education, a student assistance program (sap), and out of school programs.in cadekids classroom prevention education program, cadekids' prevention specialists equip k-8th grade students with skills to handle conflict the smart way and have the courage to stop and evaluate situations, exercise impulse control, and steer clear of violence, illegal substance use, and other destructive behaviors. With 5,000-6,000 participants served per year, cadekids' prevention specialists deliver evidence-based curricula (age-/content-appropriate) to philadelphia public school students in whole classrooms with the teacher present.the sap is designed to assess students (grades k-12) for concerns related to drug and alcohol misuse, emotional dysregulation, and behavioral/mental health issues. The 4 phases of the student assistance program are referral, screening/assessment, intervention/ recommendation, and aftercare. Sap is not a treatment program; rather, it is a comprehensive school-based program using trained personnel, and evidence-based intervention/recommendation to refer students and families to services in the community. Cadekids sap provided 256 students with targeted recommendations in the 2024-2025 school year. In fy25 the sap program also included some targeted support groups for high school students attending alternative schools.beginning in fy23, cadekids expanded its prevention education program offerings to include after school and summer programs reaching students in the crucial out of school time. Cadekids collaborated with community partners to provide fun-infused prevention education lessons and activities for students who live and/or attend school in the kensington neighborhood, one of the highest overdose communities in the city. In fy25, this also included and art-integrated saturday program that ran for 12 weeks.impact statement: cadekids teaches and mentors philadelphia public school students to stregthen their resiliency skills and empower them to make healthy choices. Founded in 1987, cadekids is a Pennsylvania-registered charitable organization that supports k-12th grade students in having the knowledge, skills, and community resources needed to succeed.cadekids' classroom education program helps k-8th grade public school students make good decisions by empowering students with the personal and social skill needed to avoid high-risk behaviors. In 2024-2025 the following number of students received each program:- 4,189 students received prevention education services- 1,187 students received a core gambling prevention program- 858 students received an additional gambling awareness program addressing gaming and social media use.- 45 students received the small group program targeting to students with significant social needs (girls circle and the council for boys and young men).- 49 students received out of school time services- cadekids focuses on elementary and middle schools located in philadelphia's most-stressed zip codes, which have the highest concentration of shootings, overdose deaths, and other environmental factors that can impact long-term well-beingour best-practice model helps students recognize their emotions to avoid self-destructive conflict. Dedicated prevention specialists maintain a year-long presence in their schools and provide students with essential life skills for academic success and staying on track for high school graduation. Cadekids has statistically significant evidence of effectiveness. In an august 2010 study of 6,200 program participants and 7,900 control group students, katherine meyers found "remarkable" fy09 results for cadekids' students, concentrated in philadelphia's lowest-performing public schools. Middle (ms) and elementary school (es) students who participated in cadekids were: -significantly more likely to have friends who did not use drugs (ms, 72%; es,

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 82% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.9%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $26.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.9%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.9% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $967K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $102K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.