Corona Del Mar Lacrosse Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205195887
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Newport Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9499330779
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $184,900
- Expenses
- $173,962
- Assets
- $126,782
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- David Meckler (President)
People named in this filing
- David Meckler (President)
- Rebekah Chanawatr (Treasurer/Secre)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Corona Del Mar Lacrosse Boosters Club was created to help establish, then provide subsequent and nescessary financial support and guidance to, the boys and girls lacrosse programs at Corona del Mar High School in Newport Beach, California.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Corona Del Mar Lacrosse Team receives majority of its funding through private contributions and fundraising activities organized through the Corona Del Mar Lacrosse Booster Club. Since inception, The Corona Del Mar Lacrosse Booster Club has raised funds to help defray the cost of player equipment, game and practice uniforms, team travel expenses, medical staff, additional staffing, and other annual expenses, benefiting approximately 100 individuals annually.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $164K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.