Cornerstone Softball Inc Csnsa
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461520528
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Oakley, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4088497794
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Addictive Disorders N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,160
- Expenses
- $62,825
- Assets
- $19,093
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- RAY EDWARD DONLEY (Executive Dir.)
- JACQUELINE FETTY (VICE-EXE DIR)
- STEPHEN SQUIRES (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Purpose of this non profit organisation is to conduct social and recreational activiites for kids and adults.
What it reported doing in 2025
To foster unity across the united states among clean and sober softball players.all board members of csnsa are active members of a 12-step recovery program. Playing organized sports in a competitive environment has been incredibly instrumental in our individual recoveries from and drug and alcohol. That personal experience led us to start the clean and sober national softball associate with a clear mission to foster unity amongst clean and sober softball players throughout the united states. We organize competitive tournaments to provide a place for the addict or alcoholic to have fun, fellowship, and of course compete without having to use drugs or alcohol.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.8%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -32.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.