Cornerstone Assisted Living Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481241079
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3147338000
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,707,036
- Expenses
- $16,870,772
- Assets
- $15,771,571
- Liabilities
- $12,840,758
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIN SHADBOLT (VP POST ACUTE & AT-HOME SERVICES & CEO/SECRETARY)
- LISA K SMADING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (END 10/2024))
- CYNTHIA D DAVENPORT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LISA ANN MUSGRAVE MHA BSN RN (SENIOR VP, POST-ACUTE AND AT-HOME SERVICES/CHAIR): $1,599,602 total reported compensation
- RYAN BREEDLOVE (DIRECTOR/VP POST ACUTE CONTINUING CARE & AT HOME SERVICES): $636,783 total reported compensation
- ERIN SHADBOLT (VP POST ACUTE & AT-HOME SERVICES & CEO/SECRETARY): $622,399 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care which sustains and improves the health of individuals and communities. We are advocates for a compassionate and just society through our actions and our words.
What it reported doing in 2024
The filing organization is a part of the ascension catholic health ministry. Ascension is a faith-based healthcare organization that delivers personalized, compassionate care to all, especially to those who need it the most. Cornerstone assisted living, inc. (cal), inspired by the healing mission of the catholic church to the elderly, maximizes dignity and independence of the residents they serve. Rooted in the catholic tradition of caring, as a corporate member of ascension living, our community is continually developing and adopting new best practices in care that enhance the experience of our residents, program participants and patients. The staff is committed to promoting the well-being of those we serve through the delivery of quality care. Cal includes a skilled nursing facility (snf) and two campuses that provide assisted living (al) and memory care (mc). The ridge campus includes a snf with 80 beds and an assisted living (al) with 63 beds. In 2025, the snf had an average occupancy of 72 or 90.0% and the assisted living had an average occupancy of 63 or 96.8%. In fy2025, 116 days of care were provided to medicaid recipents and 5,803 days were provided to medicare recipients. The broadmoor campus was converted from an assisted living to memory care in 2020. The broadmoor campus consists of 37 beds with an average memory care occupany of 30 or 81.1% in 2025. Cal serves people in the wichita area and surrounding counties which include sedgwick, reno, kingman and harvey. As a charitable organization, it is recognized that not all persons served possess the ability to purchase essential services. For medicaid residents, cal was reimbused approximately $387,619 less than our costs. In fy2025, total care of the poor provided was $14,695.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.1%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.1% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.6M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $785K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 377 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.