Corner Canyon Trails

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841419051
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Sandy, UT, USA
Phone
8018369982
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$123,372
Expenses
$112,258
Assets
$105,597
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Willam Becker (President)

People named in this filing

  • Willam Becker (President)
  • Robin McCulloch (Secretary)
  • Grant Mortensen (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Corner Canyon Trails develops, builds and improves of the Draper City Trail system. The committee works with neighboring cities such as: Alpine, Highland and Lehi to coordinate connecting trails to reduce high areas of usage. The Draper Trail system/Corner Canyon Trails System is well known and benefits not only the Draper community but other surrounding communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Corner Canyon Trails has been a major asset in the development and improvement of the Draper City Trail system. The committee has worked with neighboring cities such as: Alpine, Highland and Lehi to coordinate connecting trails to reduce high areas of usage. The Draper Trail system is well known and is advertised in bike riding publications increasing trail usage throughout the Corner Canyon area. This year trails were designed and built for all levels of bike riders, horse riders and hikers. Local schools organize youth bike clubs to encourage awareness and to develop youth physical activities. The year 2025 continued to see a great use of the Draper City Trail system.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -99.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.