Cormission

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880912224
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Cincinnati, OH, USA
Phone
5132685216
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$480,455
Expenses
$308,017
Assets
$262,829
Liabilities
$45,264

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • TAMMY ADAMS (DIRECTOR)
  • ASHLEIGH METZ (BOARD PRESID)
  • NELL MOELLER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cormissions mission is to enrich the lives of individuals with exceptionalities and their community. Cormission will provide assistance with finding and maintaining employment as well as other vocational training tasks. Outreach to at risk populations in our community will take place through various volunteer opportunities. Through adaptation of traditional forms of recreation, cormission will provide a more inclusive experience for all individuals looking for meaningful activities with others. Cormission will sponsor, host and/or participate in events and activities for individuals with exceptionalities that provide purpose and inclusion. The word developmental disabilities has been replace with the word exceptionalities as we feel those individuals are exceptional

What it reported doing in 2025

2025 program impact cormission in 2025, cormission empowered 23 individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (idd) through meaningful employment and skill- building opportunities. Participants worked in real-world environments, including 11 individuals at corcafe and 12 at the cortees print shop, gaining hands-on experience in customer service, production, and teamwork. Together, participants contributed 3,986 hours of work, building confidence, independence, and a strong sense of purpose. Through daily engagement, individuals developed critical life and workplace skills that support long-term success and greater independence. Cormission strengthened its community presence by hosting 6 events that promoted inclusion and raised awareness, while generating 70,000 in program revenue to sustain and expand opportunities. These accomplishments reflect cormissions commitment to creating pathways for individuals of all abilities to thrive, contribute, and be fully included in their community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 79.4%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $90.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51% of revenue deployed · 79.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $245K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.