Coraopolis Elks B P O 1090
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 250351115
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Coraopolis, PA, USA
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $104,937
- Expenses
- $79,053
- Assets
- $382,420
- Liabilities
- $16,435
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cheryl Olszewski (President)
- Keith Durham- (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Cheryl Olszewski (President)
- Keith Durham- (Vice President)
- Donna Haywood (Secratery)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inculate the principles of charity justice brotherly love and fidelity to recognize a belief in God to promote the welfare and enhance the hapiness of its members to quicken the spirit of American patriotism to cultivate good fellowship to perpetuate itself as a fraternal organization and to provide for its governance,. The BPO of Elks of the US will serve people & communities through programs demostratingthatElks Care and Elks Share.
What it reported doing in 2025
The beacon Grant is a community -service grant to local Elks lodges to help addresslocal community need.Cherl
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 77% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 3
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5.3%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.7%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.84; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 5.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.