Copper Basin Community Hospital Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
621448752
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Copperhill, TN, USA
Phone
4234968126
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,149,873
Expenses
$12,303,586
Assets
$1,227,357
Liabilities
$4,189,596

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNA CLARK (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANNA CLARK (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $80,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide healthcare services to the tri-state community.

What it reported doing in 2014

The hospital provided 2,256 days of care to patients admitted to the facility and 7,894 outpatient encounters.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.9%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.41; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.9% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $80K · 8 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2009 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.