Cope Baptist Mission Churches in Theunited States of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 994608451
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Catonsville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4434540080
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,082
- Expenses
- $4,524
- Assets
- $9,558
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THAWNG K MANG (PASTOR/ PRESIDENT)
- NGUL K PAU (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- THAWNG K MANG (PASTOR/ PRESIDENT)
- NGUL K PAU (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SUANG K PAU (GENERAL SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To have a worshipping fellowship for growing in faith and maturity in christ among the member churches to have friendship for intimacy and collaboration in the ministry. * to preach the word of god and witness the gospel to all nations. * to nurture our literature, language and cultural values for becoming good christians and civilians to collaborate with other organizations that share the same spirit, a common faith and vision with us based on a mutual agreement.
What it reported doing in 2025
Discipleship, Bible Teaching Program, and Outreach Program
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21.8%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 67.7%; rating input score 68
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.8% of revenue deployed · 67.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.