Ncba Clusa
Legal name: Cooperative League of the United States of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362007481
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, US
- Phone
- (240) 366-2586
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,036,129
- Expenses
- $21,295,317
- Assets
- $40,223,528
- Liabilities
- $24,697,535
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUGLAS O'BRIEN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DOUGLAS O'BRIEN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $404,343 total reported compensation
- VALERIA ROACH (EVP & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $403,495 total reported compensation
- SAMUEL FILIACI (REGIONAL DIR, SOUTHEAST ASIA): $317,714 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance the cooperative business model and strengthen communities through advocacy, development, and member services.
What it reported doing in 2025
People, nature and spices partnership (pens): originally, this was planned as a five-years project (sep.2022-sep 2027) funded by usda/food for progress ($23 m) to sustainably increase the productivity and trade of three spices (ginger, oregano and turmeric) produced in peru and following a cost-effective model. The program was terminated in june 2025 as part of the us federal government's decision to end financial support to international cooperation innitiatives. Despite its shorter implementation period, this program had a positive social, economic and environmental impact, which included: the use of environmentally friendly production practices by farmers, strengthening local associativity capacity -including farmer associations and cooperatives led by women. The project directly benefitted over 6,000 producers within the ginger, turmeric, and oregano value chains, close to 70 producer organizations and cooperatives, particularly in the geographical areas of piura, lambayeque, junn, moquegua, and tacna. Project actions were grouped into seven clusters, as follows: cluster 1 facilitating access to financial services; cluster 2 training of agricultural extension agents with focus on delivery of high-quality agro-services; cluster 3 training on agricultural production techniques (with focus on organic production and eco-friendly techniques); cluster 4 capacity building on relevant quality standards and certifications with focus on organic production; cluster 5 capacity building to strengthen producer groups and cooperatives, with focus on associativity and management skills; cluster 6 facilitation of buyer-seller linkages as a way to enhance access to markets; cluster 7 -support to relevant local-level regulations and policies, including updates to strengthen competitiveness and work of technical committees. The project's baseline was approved by usda in november 2023, and official project launch followed in 29 november. Between dec 2023 and march 2024, the project profiled beneficiaries for project activities, advanced in signing mous with strategic partners, developped training materials for capacity building activities, and engaged in the organization of activities facilitating buyer-seller linkages.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 60% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.89; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 6 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $404K · 35 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $787K reported
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.