Converting Souls Apostolic Ministries Aka CSAM Aka CSAMC Aka CSAMCU

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832073066
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Norfolk, VA, USA
Phone
7573489789
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,081
Expenses
$5,401
Assets
$5,081
Liabilities
$4,807

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • NICHOLE REDDICK (APOSTLE AND ADMINISTRATOR VOLUNTEER)
  • NICHOLE REDDICK (CFO, TRUSTEE AND ACCOUNT MANAGER VOLUNTEER)
  • ANNIE KING (MASTER PROPHETESS AND ELDER VOLUNTEER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Convert Souls with Christian Education and Services, Ordination and Education Related to Church Leadership and Spiritual Development with Gifts, Administrative Services such as Communications, Errands, Travel, Spiritual Education through ministry departments such as Women's and Men's Ministry Christ Royal Diadem Vessels, Prayer Ministry Holy Ghost Fountains, Sonship and Discipleship Education and Couple's Ministry and Church Supplies Electronics Maintenance and Utilities

What it reported doing in 2023

Csam in person and online biblical education through precept epistles and audio video online letting the rivers flow powered by wordpress and podcast and you tube channel estimated 83 followers, 1,307 visitors, 6 members communication operations funded by financial and material contributions with tithe and offerings

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.6%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.3%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.95; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 158.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.6% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.