Contra Costa Humane Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680281428
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Pleasant Hill, CA, USA
Phone
9252792247
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$580,445
Expenses
$524,562
Assets
$1,662,997
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARIE RAMAGLI (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE AMOS (CO-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAN BONO (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MARIE RAMAGLI (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • NICOLE HANEY (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Improve the quality of life for dogs and cats in our community, find homes for animals in need and provide support for people who need assistance with care for their animals.

What it reported doing in 2025

Dog programs: cchss dog programs transitioned in 2023 from a foster program to direct interaction with ccas dogs as part of the programs described below. Total dog program expenses were $21,243 for 2025, supported predominantly by donations. Enrichment (in-kennel)for 2025, kennel enrichment for ccas dogs consisted of soundproofing and treats; specifically, our team goes in mid-week and works on stuffing and distributing kong, providing in-kennel calming and enrichment whereby the soundproofing mitigates noise (dog and cat areas).sunday school (out-of-kennel)in 2025, we continued our journey to provide support to dogs who currently reside in the ccas martinez facility. Through our partnership with ccas, we recognized a need to support adoptable dogs that are susceptible to kennel stress. Based on that need, we developed programming designed to provide adoptable dogs with enrichment, exercise, and a break from their kennels, as well as basic manners training to strengthen adoption profiles with a goal to move as many dogs into successful outcomes as possible. Our teams of cchs volunteers meet every sunday at the martinez facility to provide multiple forms of enrichment. Dogs come into the sunday school program by recommendations from ccas staff and volunteers and stay in our program until they leave the facility. The type of enrichment varies and depends on the needs and preferences of each dog. Activities range from basic manners training, sniffy walks, and puzzles for mental stimulation; zoomies, agility, and fetch to blow off steam and get some exercise; pool time and pupsicles for hot days; grooming and belly rubs for relaxation and love. And all those activities come with a variety of high value treats to keep the dogs engaged. Our sunday school volunteers also support mobile adoption events, helping to introduce dogs to potential adopters at public events to find the right dog for their home environment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 73.7%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.6%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.17; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 73.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $386K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.