Carla

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
384271570
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Culver City, CA, USA
Phone
8584421047
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Printing, Publishing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$288,651
Expenses
$254,885
Assets
$58,361
Liabilities
$24,595

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lindsay Zappas (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Lindsay Zappas (President & CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Contemporary Art Review Los Angeles (Carla) is a quarterly print magazine and online platform that publishes critical reviews, artist interviews, and essays on contemporary art, with a focus on Los Angeles.

What it reported doing in 2024

Carla, the quarterly magazine, is our core program, and is a ten-year-old archive of arts coverage, interviews, and images? to date, we have published 41 print issues. Carla? s quarterly print magazine is available in over 170 galleries and art spaces in L.A. and beyond. To date, over 380+ art spaces have been featured in our pages. Carla has published texts by 160+ writers (the vast majority of whom reside in L.A.) about the work of 1,700+ artists who live or exhibit in our city. Our articles are distributed in several university libraries and on community college campuses where they are utilized for educational purposes by arts professors across the nation. In the last fiscal year, our organization produced 4 issues of our printed quarterly magazine, and 12 online reviews, publishing a total of 56 LA-based pieces of art criticism which impacted that many writers, hundreds of local artists and art spaces covered. We hosted 7 member events, which acted as entry points for our community into conversations around art. We held three public launch party events, partnering with local gallery spaces around they city, offering welcoming access points, and we held a successful fundraising event which included an art auction featuring over 100 LA-based artists. We have built a working board of artists and art workers who act as community advocates. We operate on a balanced budget, following non-profit best practices for fiscal management. Carla continues to make significant strides in organizational infrastructure and leadership, with professional development and coalition-building with peer organizations on a national level. In January, Carla? s Executive Director helped form Regional Art Publications (RAP), a new coalition of non-profit regional art publishers that is actively building collective support systems that will ensure the longevity of regionally focused art writing, nationwide. Additionally, this year we received grant support from The Getty Foundation and Critical Minded.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 60%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 53% of revenue deployed · 60% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $153K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 1 filing year from 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.