Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Delaware Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
231671903
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2155635665
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Financial Counseling

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,107,706
Expenses
$5,843,125
Assets
$9,399,327
Liabilities
$3,486,161

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHEN GARDNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • RICHARD T HOLLIS (CFO (SERVED UNTIL 09/2024)): $276,898 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL SHINKONIS (CFO (BEGAN SERVICE 08/2024)): $224,879 total reported compensation
  • STEPHEN GARDNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $208,259 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We empower individuals to achieve financial resilience and positively impact their communities. Our envisioned future is one in which pathways to financial wellness are accessible to everyone.

What it reported doing in 2024

Financial empowerment (public support): clarifi's financial empowerment program utilizes a relationship-based, case management approach to counseling individuals towards financial resilience. Counselors build long-term relationships with clients based on empathy and trust, helping them set their own financial goals such as reduced debt, improved credit, and increased savings and create a step-by-step action plan for achieving them. During initial appointments, counselors work with their clients to complete an income/expense analysis, identify financial goals, and develop a written action plan for achieving said goals. Counselors also follow up with clients at 30, 60, and 90 days post-appointment to check in on progress, record outcomes, connect the client with additional resources, and schedule further appointments. Services are often provided in community-based locations in partnership with organizations like careerlink and children's hospital of philadelphia. There are no eligibility requirements and no limitations on the volume of service per client. Clients often return for multiple follow-up appointments. This methodology increases the chance that each client makes positive behavioral changes and maintains financially healthy behaviors over time, both of which yield strong, measurable long-term outcomes. In 2024, clarifi provided 3,742 financial empowerment counseling sessions to 2,255 unique clients. Of those clients, 261 reduced use of short-term credit, 604 established emergency savings, 71 established a credit profile, 276 increased their credit score by 35+ points, and 850 achieved and maintained capacity to meet basic needs for 90 days.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.5%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $25.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.5% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $277K · 25 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.